اثرات علی تعاملات رفتاری استادان دانشگاه بر انگیزش تحصیلی و معدل تحصیلی دانشجویان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار و عضو هیئت علمی گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

در این پژوهش، اثرات علّی تعاملات رفتاری استادان دانشگاه بر انگیزش تحصیلی و معدل تحصیلی دانشجویان، بررسی شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، همه دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام نور اهواز بودند که از بین آنها 494 نفر به صورت داوطلبانه انتخاب شدند. ابزار گرد‌آوری داده‌ها، پرسشنامه تعاملات رفتاری سواری (1395)، پرسشنامه انگیزش تحصیلی هارتر (1981) و معدل تحصیلی دانشجویان بود. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS و Amos تحلیل شدند. بر اساس تحلیل، برازندگی مدل پیشنهادی پژوهش، پس از اصلاح تأیید شد. نتایج نشان داد که تعاملات رفتاری سخت‌گیرانه و همکارانه استادان بر انگیزش تحصیلی دانشجویان، اثر علّی مثبت؛ تعاملات رفتاری مخالفانه استادان بر انگیزش تحصیلی، اثر علّی منفی و تعاملات رفتاری سخت‌گیرانه استادان بر معدل تحصیلی نیز اثر علّی منفی دارد. ضمنا تعاملات رفتاری همکارانه، سخت‌گیرانه و مخالفانه استادان، به ترتیب بیشترین عامل علّی مؤثر بر انگیزش تحصیلی دانشجویان را به خود اختصاص دادند و معدل تحصیلی فقط تحت تأثیر تعاملات رفتاری سخت‌گیرانه استادان بود. یافته‌های این پژوهش نشان داد که تعاملات رفتاری استادان در انگیزش و معدل تحصیلی اثرگذارند. بنابراین، برای بهبود انگیزش و معدل تحصیلی دانشجویان، توجه به تعاملات رفتاری سخت‌گیرانه و همکارانه استادان دانشگاه ضروری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Causal Impacts of Behavioral Interactions of University Professors on Academic Motivation and Academic Performance (GPA) of Students

نویسنده [English]

  • Karim Sevari
چکیده [English]

In this study, the causal impacts of behavioral interactions of university professors on academic motivation and academic performance of students were investigated. The statistical population of this study included all students of Payam-e Noor University of Ahwaz, among whom 494 students were selected on a voluntary basis. Given the data collection tools, it was decided to make use of Behavioral Interaction Questionnaire (Savari, 2016), Motivational Orientation in the Classroom Scale (Harter, 1982) and Grade Point Average (GPA). Data analysis was done using the SPSS and AMOS software. Data analysis showed that the fitness of the proposed model was confirmed after modification. The results showed that the strict and collaborative behavioral interactions of university professors had positive causal impacts on students’ academic motivation. Besides, it was found that opposing behavioral interactions of university professors had negative causal impacts on students’ academic motivation and the strict behavioral interaction of university professors also had negative causal impacts on students’ GPA. Also, it was indicated that the collaborative, strict and opposing behavioral interactions of university professors had the highest causal impacts on students’ academic motivation and, consequently, GPA was only affected by professors’ strict behavioral interactions. The research showed that the behavioral interactions of university professors affected the students’ motivation and academic performance. Therefore, the collaborative and strict behavioral interactions of university professors should be duly regarded to improve students’ academic motivation and performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Behavioral interactions
  • university professors
  • academic motivation
  • GPA
بحرانی، محمود (1388). بررسی روایی و پایایی مقیاس انگیزش تحصیلی هارتر.فصلنامه مطالعات روان‌شناختی دانشگاه الزهرا.5 (1)، 51-72.
سواری، کریم (1395). ساخت و اعتباریابی پرسشنامه تعاملات رفتاری اساتید دانشگاه با دانشجویان. تحقیق چاپ نشده.
 
Ayaz, Muhammad; Shah, Rahmatullah Khan & Gul, Andaz (2013). The impact of Students-Teachers Relationship on students; academic achievements at Secondary level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.International Journal of Learning & Development. 3 (1), 181-190.
Beyazkurk, D. & Kesner, J. E. (2005). Teacher-child relationships in Turkish and United States schools: a cross-cultural study. International Education Journal, 547-554.
Blankstein, A.; Cole, R. & Houston, P. (2007). Engaging every learner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Birch, S. H. & Ladd, G. W. (1998). Children’s interpersonal behaviors and the teacher child relationship. Developmental Psychology, 34, 934-946.
Brekelmans, M; Levy, J; & Rodriguez, R. (1993). A typology of teacher communication style. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.). Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education, 46–55. London: Flamer Press.
Brekelmans, M. (1989). Interpersonal teacher behavior in the classroom. Utrecht: W.C.C. (in Dutch).
Brok, P. Den.; Brekelmans, M. & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behavior and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15 (3-4), 407-442.
Brophy-Herb, H.; Lee, R.; Nievar, M. & Stollak, G. (2007). Preschoolers’ social competence Relations to family characteristics, teacher behaviors and classroom climate. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28 (2), 134-148.
Cooke, M. (2011). Positive teacher student relationships play a unique role for students with special needs. Unpublished research.
Den Brok, P. J.; Brekelmans, M. & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behavior and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 407–442.
Dorman, J. P.; Fisher, D. L. & Waldrip, B. G. (2006). Classroom environment, students’ perceptions of assessment, academic efficacy and attitude to science: A LISREL analysis. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments worldview, 1–28. Singapore: World Scientific.
Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review Psychology, 53,109-32.
Eschenmann, K. (1991). Student Perceptions of Teaching Style in The Health Occupation Classroom. Journal of Health Occupations Education, 6 (1), 5-20.
Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom learning environments. In: Abell, S. K. & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 103-24.
Fraser, B. J. & Walberg, H. J. (2005). Research on teacher-student relationships and learning environments: Context, retrospect and prospect. Inter J Educ Res, 43, 103-09.
Frymier, A. B. (1993). The relationships among communication apprehension, immediacy, and motivation to study. Communication Reports, 6, 8-17.
Gablinske, Patricia Brady (2014). A case study of student and teacher relationships and the effect on student learning. Unpublished research.
Goh, S. C. & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Teacher interpersonal teacher behavior and elementary students’ outcomes. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14, 216-231.
Goodenow, C. (1992). Strengthening the links between educational psychology and the study of social contexts. Educational Psychologist, 27, 177–196.
Guo, Y.; Piasta, S. B.; Justice, L. M. & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Relations among preschool teachers’ self-efficacy, classroom quality, and children’s language and literature gains. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26 (4), 1094-1103.
Hamre, B. K. & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher–child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72 (2), 625-638.
Harter, S. (1981). A new self– report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300 – 312.
Henderson, D. G. (1995). A study of the classroom and laboratory environments and student attitude and achievement in senior Secondary Biology classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
Hughes, J. N. & Chen, Q. (2011). Reciprocal effects of student–teacher and student– peer relatedness: Effects on academic self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32 (5), 278–287.
Juvonen, J. (2006). Sense of belonging, social bonds, and school functioning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology. 655-674. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Kodzi, I.; Oketch, M.; Ngware, M.; Mustiya, M. & Nderu, E. (2011). Social Relations as Predictors of Mathematics Achievement in Kenyan Primary Schools. African Population and Health Research Center Nairobi, Kenya. Unpublished research.
Knoell, Christopher M. (2012). The role of the student-teacher relationship in the lives of fifth graders.Unpublished research.
Leary, T. (1957). An interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press Company.
Liberante, Lauren (2012). The importance of teacher–student relationships, as explored through the lens of the NSW Quality Teaching Model. Journal of Student Engagement: Education matters, 2 (1), 2-9.
Lourdusamy, A. & SweKhine, M. (2001). Self-evaluation of interpersonal behavior and classroom interaction by teacher trainees. Paper presented at The International Education Research Conference, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle Western Australia. Retrieved November 11, 2007, from The Australian 126 Association for Research in Education.
Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods & Measures, 6, 99-125.
Mazer, J. P. (2013). Associations among teacher communication behaviors, student interest, and engagement: A validity test. Communication Education, 62, 86-96.
Nugent,.T. (2006). Impact of student-teacher interactions in relation to student motivation and achievement. Unpublished research.
Opdenakker, M. C.; Maulana, R. & den Brock, P. (2012). Teacher-student interpersonal relationships and academic motivation within one school year: Developmental changes and linkage. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 95-119.
Paulson, S. E.; Marchant, G. J. & Rothlisberg, B. A. (1998). Early adolescents’ perceptions of patterns of parenting, teaching, and school atmosphere: Implications for achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18 (1), 5-26.
Pianta, R. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. New York: American Psychological Association.
Pickens, T. (2010). Personal or professional? Reflecting on teacher-student relationship. Journal of Classroom Teaching & Learning, 17 (2), 7-25.
Roorda, D. L.; Koomen, H. M. Y.; Spilt, J. L. & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach’. Review of Educational Research, 81 (4), 493–529.
Silins, H. & Murray-Harvey, R. (1995). Quality schooling versus school performance: What do students and teachers think? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to Learn: Integrating Theory and Practice. Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Spilt, J.; Koomen, H. M. & Thijs, J. (2011).Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher–student relationships’. Educational Psychology Review, 23 (4), 457– 477.
Toste, J. R.; Heath, N. L. & Dallaire, L. (2010). Perceptions of classroom working alliance and student Performance. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 56, 371-387.
Tyler, K. & Boelter, C. (2008). Linking Black Middle School Students' Perceptions of Teachers' Expectations to Academic Engagement and Efficacy. Negro Educational Review.
Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (2), 202- 209.
Whitaker, Todd. (2004). What great principals do differently. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc.
Wilkins, J. (2006). An examination of student and teacher behaviors that contribute to good student-teacher relationships in large urban high schools. Good student-teacher relationships. Buffalo, New York: New York State University.
Wubbels, T.; Brekelmans, M.; den Brok, P. & Tartwijk, J. (2006). An interpersonal perspective on Classroom Management in Secondary Classrooms in the 129 Netherlands. In C. Evertson & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues, 1161-1191.
Wubbels, T. & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6-24.
Wubbels, T. & Levy, J. (1993). Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education. London: Falmer Press.
Wubbels, T.; Cre´ton, H. A. & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985). Discipline problems of beginning teachers, interactional teacher behavior mapped out. Abstracted in Resources in Education, 20 (12), 153-164.