سرمد، زهره؛ بازرگان، عباس و حجازی، الهه (1384). روشهای تحقیق در علوم رفتاری. تهران: نشر آگاه.
لرد، فردریک (1980). کاربردهای نظریه سؤال- پاسخ؛ ترجمه علی دلاور و جلیل یونسی. تهران: انتشارات رشد.
Brennan, R. L (2006). (Ed.). Educational measurement (4th ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Godfrey, K. E. (2007). A comparison of Kernel equating and IRT true score equating methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Greensboro. Retrieved from ProQuest. (AAT 3273329).
Grant, M. C.; Zhang, L.; Damiano, M. & Lonstein, L. (2006). An evaluation of the kernel equating method: Small sample equating in non-equivalent groups. Paper presented at the national conference of AERA/NCME, 2006.
Hanson, B. A. & Béguin, A. A. (2002). Obtaining a common scale for IRT item parameters using separate versus concurrent estimation in the common item nonequivalent groups equating design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26 (1), 3-24.
Kolen, M. J. & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test Equating Methods and Practices. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lee, Y., & von Davier, A. A. (2010). Equating through alternative kernels. In A. A. von Davier (Ed.), Statistical models for test equating, scaling, and linking (pp. 159-173). New York: Springer.
Lee, Y. H. (2007). Contributions to the statistical analysis of item response time in educational testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
Livingston, S. A., Dorans, N. J. & Wright, N. K. (1990). What combination of sampling and equating methods work best? Applied Measurement in Education, 3, 73-95.
Peterson, N. S and Cook L.L (1989). Problems related to the use of conventional and item response theory equating methods in less than optimal circumstances. Applied psychological measurement. 11, 225- 244.
R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
Sinharay, S. & Holland, P. W. (2007). Is it necessary to make anchor tests mini-versions of the tests being equated or can some restrictions be relaxed? Journal of Educational Measurement, 44 (3), 249-275.
Von Davier, A. A., Holland, P. W., Thayer, D. T. (2004). The Kernel Method of Test Equating. New York: Springer-Verlag.