Reflection on the Anthropological Foundations of "Quality Assessment" in the Iranian Higher Education and its Compatibility with Islamic Anthropology

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 department of education facuity of humanitis shahed university

2  Ph.D. in Philosophy of Education. Tehran University- Tehran- Iran

Abstract

Quality assessment is one of the most common reforms of higher education in different countries of the world, which has been expanding especially since the 1990s and under the influence of Neoliberalism. The purpose of this quality assessment was to make university accountable and transparent, and thus improve the quality of the university as a market-oriented institution. In recent years, these market-oriented reforms have prevailed in different countries of the world and their footprint can also be seen in the higher education of Iran. The purpose of the present research was to study quality assessment with a critical and philosophical perspective. To achieve this goal, conceptual analysis, qualitative content analysis and inferential method were used. First, an attempt was made to analyze quality assessment as a concept and to examine its anthropological foundations. The next step was to analyze the market-based quality assessment and related reforms in the supporting documents of Iranian higher education, and finally the compatibility of anthropological foundations of market-oriented quality assessment with the Islamic perspective has been studied.
The findings of this study indicate that quality assessment in the core of marketisation relies on the anthropological foundations of Neoliberalism and especially homo economicus model. This model account man as a self-interested, utility-maximizer, and competitive being. From this point of view, economic rationality is the supreme model for all rational activity and should be guide of all other human activities. Marketisation is the result of the idea that its goal is to manage institutions such as universities in a market-oriented way, which is interpreted as New Public Management (NPM). Therefore, market-oriented quality assessment tries to evaluate the quality of the university in a way similar to commercial companies and to make the university transparent and responsive to the needs of customers. Thus in these model universities, for funding, have to compete with other universities and higher institutions in competitive higher education markets. Therefore, the student is a customer of knowledge and educational services, and the university attracts her/him through marketing and offers her/him the knowledge as a commodity. In higher education markets, economic rationality and cost-benefit logic control and regulate all relationship and process includes quality assessment.
Examination of Iranian higher education support documents indicates the impact of the NPM and market-based quality assessment. In these documents, market-oriented reforms are accepted as one of the necessities of modernizing the university, which the university must accept them for transformation. In these documents, an attempt has been made to intertwine market-oriented reforms with Islamic-Iranian goals. Competitiveness of universities, uncontrolled development of privatization, development of commercialization logic, and market-based quality assessment in universities are examples of market-oriented reforms considered in Iran's higher education supporting documents. Of course, market-oriented reforms in Iran can be considered as a kind of quasi-Neoliberalism that, although it has retained some basic principles of Neoliberalism, but in the cultural context of Iranian higher education, it has taken a different form and has created new damages.  These reforms further seek to make the university financially independent from state funding, but at the same time increase the government's indirect control over the university by new methods of quality assessment. The commodification of knowledge, the student as a customer, the evaluation of quality on the basis of quantity and the production of objective results, coercive accountability and the resulting moral model have important cultural and philosophical meanings that have been severely criticized in the Islamic view. Market-oriented quality assessment leads to a kind of prformativity and quantification, and its result is a kind of academic ethics based on cost-benefit logic. In this view, knowledge, educational services and educational relations are evaluated based on the profitability. In this view, the religious and traditional conception of knowledge as a path to perfection and the moral values based on it are seriously questioned. At a market-oriented university, a university professor is a knowledge provider, and his value depends on the extent of his educational services and customer satisfaction.

Keywords


باقری، خسرو (1391). تأملی بر روابط فرهنگ، بازار و دانشگاه، مجله علوم تربیتی دانشگاه چمران اهواز، 19(2)، 7- 22.
باقری، خسرو (1382). هویت علم دینی؛ نگاهی معرفت‌شناختی به نسبت دین با علوم انسانی. سازمان چاپ و انتشارات وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
باقری، خسرو (1390). نگاهی دوباره به تربیت اسلامی. جلد دوم. انتشارات مدرسه.
باقری، خسرو (1396). یک رؤیا دو بستر؛ تنش‌زدایی از دانشگاه و علوم انسانی. پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
زیباکلام، فاطمه؛ محمدی، حمداله (1396). از مکتب تربیتی لیبرالیسم تا نولیبرالیسم؛ نگاهی انتقادی. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
دین‌پرست، فائز؛ ساعی، علی (1391). بازسازی روش‌شناختی نظریة انتخاب عمومی. فصلنامه مطالعات میان رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، 4(2)، 87-109.
شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی (1389). سند نقشة جامع علمی کشور. سایت: Http://Sccr.ir
شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی (1385). اسناد پشتیبان نقشه جامع علمی کشور (کمیتة آموزش)
فراستخواه، مقصود (1388). دانشگاه و آموزش عالی: منظرهای جهانی ومسئله‌های ایرانی. نشر نی.
فتح‌اللهی، احمد؛ یمنی، محمد؛ صباغیان، زهرا؛ فراستخواه، مقصود؛ قاضی طباطبایی، محمود (1393). تحلیل محتوای برنامه‌های پنج گانه توسعه ایران با توجه به مقوله‌های حکمرانی آموزش عالی. فصلنامه انجمن آموزش عالی، 6(4)، 47- 83.
فوکو، میشل (1394). تولد زیست سیاست: درس گفتارهای کلژو دو فرانس، 1978-1979؛ ترجمة رضا نجف‌زاده. نشر نی.
کومبز، جرالد و لو، روی بی. دنیلز (1388). پژوهش فلسفی: تحلیل مفهومی. (ترجمة دکتر خسرو باقری). در: شورت، ادموند سی (ویراستار.). روش شناسی مطالعات برنامه درسی؛ ترجمه محمود مهرمحمدی و دیگران. انتشارات سمت.
محمدی، حمداله (1397). بررسی چالش‌های اساسی تجاری‌سازی در نظام آموزش عالی ایران بر اساس نقد مبانی انسان‌شناختی مکتب تربیتی نولیبرالیسم و ارائه مفهوم بدیل. رساله مقطع دکتری. دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران.
محمدی، حمداله؛ زیباکلام، فاطمه (1393). نولیبرالیسم و تجاری‌سازی تربیت؛ چالشی فراروی تربیت اخلاقی. پژوهشنامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت، 4(2)، 95-116.
محمدی، حمداله؛ باقری، خسرو؛ تلخابی، محمود؛ میرزامحمدی، محمدحسن (1397). تعلیم و تربیت و کارآفرین رقابتی؛ تاملی بر تحول مفهوم انسان اقتصادی از مکتب تربیتی لیبرالیسم کلاسیک تا نولیبرالیسم. پژوهشنامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت. 2(8): 123-142
معاونت پژوهش، تدوین و تنقیح قوانین و مقررات ریاست جمهوری (1383). قانون برنامة چهارم توسعه. تهران: انتشارات معاونت پژوهش، تدوین و تنقیح قوانین و مقررات ریاست جمهوری.
مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی (1389). قانون برنامه پنجم توسعه. http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/790196
سازمان برنامه و بودجة کشور (1396). قانون برنامه ششم توسعه. پایگاه اطلاع‌رسانی برنامة ششم توسعه.
سازمان پژوهش و برنامه ریزی آموزشی (1398). گفتارهایی درباره برنامه درسی فطرت‌گرا بر اساس برنامه درسی ملی. انتشارات مدرسه.
مرکز مطالعات مجلس شورای اسلامی (1389). برنامة پنجم توسعه جمهوری اسلامی ایران. آدرس سایت:
http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/790196
وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری (1390). آیین‌نامة نظام نظارت، ارزیابی و تضمین کیفیت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، سایت: https://nezarat.msrt.ir/fa/regulation/833
وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری (1396) نگاهی به یک دهه تجربه نظام نوین ارزشیابی کیفیت در آموزش عالی. سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور، مرکز تحقیقات، ارزشیابی، اعتبارسنجی و تضمین کیفیت آموزش عالی.
Ambrosio, J. (2013). Changing the Subject: Neoliberalism and Accountability in Public Education, Educational Studies. A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 49(4), 316-333
Amit, V. (2000). The university as Panopticon: moral claims and attacks on academic freedom. In: Strathern, M. (Ed.). Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity. The Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228.
Barnett, R. (2011). The marketised university: defending the indefensible, in: Mike Molesworth, Richard Scullion and Elizabeth Nixon (Eds.). The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group
Becker, G. (1993). Nobel Lecture: the Economic Way of Looking to Behavior. The Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385- 409
Buchanan, J. (1984). Politic without Romance: a Sketch of Positive Public Choice and its Normative Implications. In: Buchanan, James and Tollison, Robert(Ed). The Theory of Public Choice. The University of Michigan Press.
Buchanan, J., & Geoffrey, B. (1984). The Normative Purpose of Economic Science: Rediscovery of an Eighteenth Century Method. In: Buchanan, J. and Tollison, R. (Eds). The Theory of Public Choice. The University of Michigan Press.
Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and Freedom. Fortieth Anniversary Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Furedi, F. (2011). Introduction to the Marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer. In: Mike Molesworth, Richard Scullion and Elizabeth Nixon (Eds). The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group
Giroux, H. (2005). Border Crossing: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. Second Edition. Routledge.
Hayek, F.A (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Routledge Classic.
Hayek, F.A (1988). The Fatal Conceit: the Error of Socialism. Routledge
Hayek, F. A. (2010). Studies on Abuse and Decline of the Reason, Edited by Bruce Caldwell. University of Chicago Press.
Hyland, T. (2011) Mindfulness, therapy and vocational values: exploring the moral and aesthetic dimensions of vocational education and training. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63(2), 129 -141
Mirzamohammadi, M. H. & Mohammadi, H. (2017). Neoliberalism and Higher Education in Iran; A Critical Perspective. Problem of Education in 21th Century, 75(5), 467- 482
Mohammadi, H. & Mirzamohammadi, M. H. (2020). New Public Management in the Iranian Higher Education; a Moral Analysis. Ethics and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2019.1700453
Olssen, M. & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313-345.
Oksala, J. (2013). Neoliberalism and Biopolitical Governmentality. In: Nilsson, J. and Wallenstein, S. (Eds). Foucault, Biopolitics and Governmentality. Sodertorn Philosophical Studies: 7-35
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-Focused Evaluation, SAGE
Read, J. (2009). A Genealogy of Homo-Economicus: Neoliberalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25-36
Shore, C. & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive Accountability: The rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education. In: Strathern, M. (Ed). Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Webb, T. (2011). The evolution of accountability, Journal of Education Policy, 26(6), 735-756.