Alrashidi, O.; Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Academic Engagement: An Overview of Its Definitions, Dimensions, and Major Conceptualisations. International Education Studies, 9 (12), 41-52.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1 (3), 385-405.
Beins, B. C. (1993). Writing assignments in statistics classes encourage students to learn interpretation. Teaching of Psychology, 20 (3), 161-164.
Beninel, F.; Biernacki, C.; Bouveyron, C.; Jacques, J., & Lourme, A. (2012). Parametric link models for knowledge transfer in statistical learning. In D. Ilic (Ed.), Knowledge Transfer: Practices, Types and Challenges. Nova Science Publishers.
Ben-Zvi, D. (2000). Toward understanding the role of technological tools in statistical learning. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 2 (1-2), 127-155.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32 (3), 347-364.
Brady, T. F., & Oliva, A. (2008). Statistical learning using real-world scenes extracting categorical regularities without conscious intent. Psychological Science, 19 (7), 678-685.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.
Brundiers, K.; Wiek, A., & Redman, C. L. (2010). Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11 (4), 308-324.
Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2006). Statistical learning within and between modalities pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations. Psychological Science, 17 (10), 905-912.
Corbin, J.; Strauss, A., & Strauss, A. L. (2014). Basics of qualitative research. Sage.
Cross, E. S.; Schmitt, P. J., & Scott, T. G. (2007). Neural Substrates of Contextual Interference during Motor Learning Support a Model of Active Preparation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 (11), 1-18.
Daniel, F., & Braasch, J. L. (2013). Application Exercises Improve Transfer of Statistical Knowledge in Real-World Situations. Teaching of Psychology, 4 (3), 200-207.
Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323 (5910), 66-69.
Gegenfurtner, A. (2011). Motivational Influences on Transfer: Dimensions and Boundary Conditions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Turun Yliopisto University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Husman, J., & Hilpert, J. (2007). The intersection of students' perceptions of instrumentality, self-efficacy, and goal orientations in an online mathematics course. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21 (3/4), 229-239.
Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999).The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34 (2), 113-125.
Husman, J.; McCann, E., & Crowson, H. M. (2000). Volitional strategies and future time perspective: embracing the complexity of dynamic interactions. International Journal of Educational Research, 33 (7), 777-799.
Johanson, J., & Fried, C. (2002). Job training versus graduate school preparation: Are separate educational tracks warranted? Teaching of Psychology, 29 (3), 241-243.
Kosonen, P., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Effects of Teaching Statistical Laws on Reasoning About Everyday Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87 (1), 33-46.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Namey, E.; Guest, G.; Thairu, L., & Johnson, L. (2008). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. Handbook for Team-Based Qualitative Research, 2, 137-161.
Patton, M. Q. (2003). Qualitative evaluation checklist. Evaluation Checklists Project.
Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (5), 233-238.
Phalet, K.; Andriessen, I., & Lens, W. (2004). How future goals enhance motivation and learning in multicultural classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (1), 59-89.
Riege, A. M. (2003). Validity and reliability tests in case study research: a literature review with “hands-on” applications for each research phase. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 6 (2), 75-86.
Simons, J.; Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn! British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (3), 343-360.
Simons, J.; Vansteenkiste, M.; Lens, W., &Lacante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective.Educational Psychology Review, 16 (2), 121–139.
Stalder, D. R., & Olson, E. A. (2011). T for two: Using mnemonics to teach statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 38, 247-250.
Tabachnik, S. E.; Miller, R. B., &Relyea, G. E. (2008). The relationships among students’ future oriented goals and subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and task-oriented self-regulation strategies in an academic environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 629-642.
Turk-Browne, N. B., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Flexible visual statistical learning: transfer across space and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35 (1), 195-202.
VanderStoep, S. W., & Shaughnessy, J. J. (1997). Taking a course in research methods improves reasoning about real-life events. Teaching of Psychology, 24 (2), 122-124.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2004). How to become a persevering exerciser? Providing a clear, future intrinsic goal in an autonomy-supportive way. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26 (2), 232−249.