Comparative Study of Learning Strategies, Learning Styles and Study Approaches Amon High School Students Experimental, Mathematical, Human

Document Type : Original Article


1 Assistance Proffoser ,Arak University, Arak, Iran

2 Assistance Proffsoer, Azadd University,Garmsar, Iran

3 Student, Azad University, Aligudarz, Iran



Objective: The purpose of this study is a comparative study of learning strategies, learning styles and study approaches among high school students (experimental, mathematical, human). Aligudarz is done
Methods: The statistical sample consisted of 240 students from three groups (80 humanities, 80 experimental students, 80 mathematics students) were determined by the available method. The research tools were Pantridge et al.'s Motivational Strategies Questionnaire, the Club Learning Style Questionnaire, and the Martin and Seljo Study Approaches and Skills Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using t-test for independent groups and one-way and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA ANOVA) using SPSS software.  
Results: The overall results showed that learning styles, learning strategies and study approaches are different among the volunteers of all three groups. The results of multivariate analysis of variance of group effects and learning strategies showed that the mental review group variable with 64.07% had the highest ETA square and the critical thinking group variable had the lowest ETA square with 0.1% and divergent group with 0.06 in learning styles. 77% highest and convergent group with 32% lowest ETA radar and variable depth approach group with 64% highest and variable approach group with 51% lowest
Conclusion: ETA radar and in fact study strategies, styles and approaches between groups independently and in pairs It was found that there was a difference.


Main Subjects

Yadollahifar,M &Mirzaei, D.(2020).relationship among trinialism,garetion strategies with learning stage and chievement performance.journal of cognition strategies in learning,8,(14),pp205-224(in persin).
Akbari,.M,. & Fathabadi ,.J,.Almasi,.E,.Mohammadzadeh,.J,.(2019),.review of relation study approaches with achievement progress ,. Journal of resesrch in curriculum ,.16(61),.pp75-84.(in Persian)
Omidian,.M ,.Rahmati,.A,.Farhadirad,.ah,.(2018),.experinced lived in konkor with stress ,.journal of higher education in Iran,.10(2),.pp1-19,.(in persian)
Imanparvar,.S,. & Narimani,M ,.Takloy,S ,.Hashemi,.T,.(2020),.desining pakage educational and clinical and review if effectiveness on achievement and motivation in students stage 12,. Journal of cognitive strategies in learning,.8(14),.pp21-36.(in Persian)
Barati,.Z,. & Farzad,.V,.Sedghpour ,.S,.Bahram ,.P,.(2020),.predicting achievement base on learning strategies and achievement values,.journal of educational psychology,. 16(58),.pp25-45.(in Persian)
Babamohammadi,.H,. & Sayyadjo,.Z,. Deihimfar ,.F ,.Charbashloo,.H,.(2018),.learning stages in students clinical sciences in Semnan,.
Biyabangard,.E,.(2007),.educational psychology ,.Virayesh publication.
Ashori,.M,. & Vahedi,.S,.Adib,.Y,.Badri,.R,.(2020),.study experinces of voulentary tests in konkor ,.a case study ,.journal of phsychological sciences ,.19(96),.pp1593-1605.(in Persian)
Asghari,.Z,.& Kareshki ,.H,.Mahram,B,.(2018),.outcomes of phsychological in konkor stations ,. Journal of educational psychological in Allameh tabatabaei university,.14(49),.pp173-202.(in Persian)
Aasareh,.A,.& Farhosh,.M,.(2015),.relation thinking stages with learning strategies in students female secondary ,.journal of curriculum studies,.11(49),.pp121-152.(in Persian)
Asri,.L,& .Jahani,N,. Razavi,.S,.(2020),.review of relation study and learning strategies with achievement performance in students ,.journal of research in clinical sciences ,.16(1),.pp67-70.(in Persian)
Farajollahi,.M,.& Najafi,H,.Nosrati,.K,.Najafian,S,.(2013),.learning stages and achievement progress ,.journal of education strategies in clinica sciences,.6,pp84-88.(in Persian)
Ghadampour,E,.&Geravand,H,.Sabzian,S,.(2020),.relation learning stages with achievement motivation in students of Lorestan province ,.journal of educational studies,.9(2),.pp7-32.(in Persian)
Gholkhanbaz,F,.Khodaei,E,.(2013),effect social-economic station in students of university test to achievement academic ,.journal of measurement &evaluation studies ,.4(5),.pp55-79.(in Persian).
Ghiasi sarraki,E, & Eskandari,S,Ardeshiri,H,Gharibshahi,A,.(2017),.comparison learning stages between courses ,.council of education &psychology.
Sajjadi,R, &,Karamdost,N,.Dorrani,K,Moghaddamzadeh,A,Salehi,K,(2017),.researching dimensions achievement in university test,.journal of curriculum studies ,8(16),pp163-190.(in Persian)
Kamari,.S, & Fooladchang,M,.(2017),.relation between learning approaches with achievement performance in students  with role of sexity.Farhangian university ,journal of educational studyties.,5(15),.pp24-34.(in Persian)
Karevan,.F,.(2021),.desighining process:since theory to practice base on thinking and learning stage in students,.2(31),.pp23-38.(in Persian)
Manzari tavakoli,.V,.(2020),.meta analyse relation self regulated learning strategies and motivational strategies with achievement performance.journal of educational psychology ,.16(58),pp 95-115.(in Persian)
Mahmoodzadeh,.A,.Javadi,A,.Mohammadi,Y,.(2015),.relation between dimension study approaches with achievement performance in students clinical sciences university of Birjand .8(3),pp9-16.(in Persian)
Salimi,.J,& Pasalari ,H,.(2015),.role of achievement and social characterizes in students in Hormozgan province in achievement in university test,.journal of measurement and educational evaluation studies,.7(18),.pp91-125.(in Persian)
Seif,.A,.(2016),.educatinal psychology ,.doran publication,.Tehran.Iran.(in Persian)
Shakornia,.A,& Ghaforian,M,.Elhampour,H,.(2013),.comparsion study approaches and learning in students course of clinical and relation with achievement performance,journal of development in clinica sciences,.9(2),pp89-94.(in Persian)
Yazdankhahfard,M.Gholami baroghi,S.Bahraini,M.Mirzaei,K.learning,(2018),.approaches in students parastari ,case study,.journal Iranian education in clinical sciences,.18(81),.pp363-371.(in Persian)
Altun, F. &Yazici, H. (2010). Learning styles of the gifted students in Turkey.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sceincec, 9: 198-202.
Asikainen, H. & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do Students Develop Towards More Deep Approaches to Learning During Studies? A Systematic Review on the Development of Students’Deep and Surface Approaches to Learning in Higher Education. Educ Psychol Rev, DOI 10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6.
Baeten, M., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2013). Enhancing students’ approaches to learning: the added value of gradually implementing case-based learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 315-336.
Baghban, V., & Zohoorian, Z. (2012). The relationship between Iranian English language learners’ learning styles and strategies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 771-777.
Bustamante, A. S., White, L. J., & Greenfield, D. B. (2016). Approaches to learning and school readiness in Head Start: Applications to preschool science. Learning and Individual Differences, 1–7.
Cheema, J., & Kitsantas, A. (2016). Predicting high school student use of learning strategies: the role of preferred learning styles and classroom climate. Educational Psychology, Vol 36, N 5. pp 845-862.
Cohen, A. D. (2011). Second language learner strategies. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 2(Part V), 681-698
DeCoux, V. M. (2016). Kolb's learning style inventory: A review of its applications in nursing research. Journal of Nursing Education, 29(5), 202-207
Donker As, de Boer H, Kostons D, Dignath van EwijK CC, van der Werfa MPC. Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta- analysis. Edu Res Rev.2014;11:1-26
Entwistle, N.; Tait, H. & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1, 33-48.
Everaert, P., Opdecam, E., & Maussen, S. (2017). The relationship between motivation, learning approaches, academic performance and time spent. Accounting Education. Vol26. No 1. pp 78-107.
Goldman D. Working with emotional intelligence.(1998). New York: Bantam Books Publisher.
Hasanzadeh, R., & Shahmohamadi, F. (2011). Study of emotional intelligence and learning strategies. Journal of social and behavioral sciences, 29: 1824 - 1829.
Hu, B. Y., Teo, T., Nie, Y., Wu, Z. (2017). Classroom quality and Chinese preschool Children's approaches to learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 51–59.
Keefe, J. W. (1999). Learning Style Profile Handbook: II. Accommodating Perceptual, Study, and Instructional Preferences.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education, 4(2), 193-212.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc
KÜÇÜK, M. (2012). The relationship between online learners’ learning styles and learning strategies. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), Vol.42, 287-298.
Iurea, c. ;Neacsu, I. ;Safta, C. G. &Suditu, M. (2011). The study of the relation between the teaching method and the learning styles -the impact upon the student’s academic conduct. Procedia Social and Behavioval Sciences, 11: 256-260.
Lin, C.-L., Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2012). An investigation of two profiles within conceptions of learning science: an examination of confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 499-521.
Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Parpala, A., & Postareff, L. (2018). What constitutes the surface approach to learning in the light of new empirical evidence? Studies in Higher Education, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1482267
Murray, B. (1998). Getting smart about learning is her lesson, Claire Ellen Weinstein's notion of strategic learning has enjoyed growing acceptance in higher education. American Psychological Association (APA) online, 29(4).
Nasirzadeh F, Heidarzadeh A, Shirazi M, Farmanbar R, Monfared A.(2014). [Assessing learning styles of students in Guilan university of medical sciences, 2013]. Research in Medical Education. 6(1): 29-39. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.rme.6.1.29. (Persian).
Olejarczuk, E. (2014). Investigating the relationship between learning styles, learning strategies and students’ performance in a blended learning course: A research proposal. Konińskie Studia Językowe (KSJ), Vol. 2(3), 257-271.
Peak, B. & Miller, Ch. (2010). I think I can, I think I can, I think I can't know I can multi-user virtual environments(moves)as a means of developing competence and confidence in undergraduate nursing .2, 4571-4575.
Phan, H. P. (2011). Deep Processing Strategies and Critical Thinking: Developmental Trajectories Using Latent Growth Analyses. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(4), 283-294.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2015). Approaches to learning or levels of processing: what did Marton and Säljö (1976a) really say? The legacy of the work of the Göteborg group in the 1970s. Interchange, 46, 239–269.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Approaches to studying, conception of learning and learning styles in higher education.Learning and Individual Differences, 21: 288-293.
Riding R, Chemo L. Cognitive styles: An overview and integration: Educational psychology. Int J Exp Educ Psychol. 1991;9:132-42
Skehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in second language acquisition, 13(02), 275-298.
Stroud, K., C. (2006). Development of the school motivation and strategies inventory.URL:http//www.Education.Umd.Edu/EDHD/faculty2/Alexander/ARL/intl/Buehl 2003.pdf (5/4/2007).
Suliman, W. A. (2006). Critical thinking and learning styles of students in conventional and accelerated programs. Int Nurs Rev., 53(1), pp. 73-79.
Svedin, Maria (2016). Do excellent engineer's approch their studies strategically? A quantitative study of students approaches to learning in computer science education. Doctoral Thesis No. 26, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
TafazolM,KhadivadivzadehT. [Midwifery students Learning styles].Aasrar 2002; 9(2):10-15.
Tijani, F. Y.; Abimbola, O. G.; Namusoke, J.; Adeyemi, T. S.; Egbekunle, E. A. & Kehinde, E. O. (2016). Comparative Study of Students ‘Approaches and Strategies to Learning: Implications for Counselling. European Scientific Journal, 12 (16). 10.19044/esj.
Tulbure, C. (2011). Do different learning styles require differentiated teaching strategies? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 155-159.
Wahlheim, C. N., McDaniel, M. A., & Little, J. L. (2016). Category learning strategies in younger and older adults: Rule abstraction and memorization. Psychology and Aging, 31(4), 346-357.
Wilson, J. D. (2018). Student learning in higher education. Routledge.
Woolfolk, A.E.(2004). Educational Psychology, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Yeo, D. J., & Fazio, L. K. (2018). The optimal learning strategy depends on learning goals and processes: Retrieval practice versus worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication
Yılmaz MB, Orhan F. The use of Internet by high school students for educational purposes in respect to their learning approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010; 2(2): 2143-50.
Yonker, J. E. (2011): The relationship of deep and surface study approaches on factual and applied test‐bank multiple‐choice question performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36:6, 673- 686.