حیدری، حسین (1384). تأثیر دو روش (5E) وسنتی بر پیشرفت تحصیلی دانشآموزان کلاس پنجم ابتدایی در درس علوم شهرستان قائمشهر در سال تحصیلی 84-83. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
رضوی، عباس (1390). مباحث نوین در فناوری آموزشی. اهواز: دانشگاه شهید چمران.
صفوی، امانالله (1390). روشها، فنون و الگوهای تدریس. تهران: سمت.
قاضی طباطبایی، محمود؛ حاتمی، جواد؛ فردانش، هاشم؛ مجدانیان، آذر و اسلامی، زهرا (1388). مقایسه اثربخشی طراحی آموزشی ملهم از سه نظریه رفتارگرایی، شناختگرایی و ساختگرایی در تغییر نگرشهای اجتماعی، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی روانشناسی دانشگاه تبریز، 4 (13)
کرمی، مرتضی؛ فردانش، هاشم؛ عباسپور، عباس (1388). مقایسه اثربخشی الگوهای طراحی آموزشی سیستمی و سازندهگرا در آموزش مدیران. دوفصلنامه مدیریت و برنامهریزی در نظامهای آموزشی، 2 (3): 9-30.
مالکی، مائده (1389). تأثیر الگوی طراحی آموزشی گانیه و پنج مرحلهای بایبی در آموزش مبتنی بر شبکه بر یادگیری، یادداری وانگیزش دانشجویان. فصلنامه روانشناسی تربیتی، 5 (15).
مرادی، مهسا (1391
). مقایسه تأثیر روش آموزش مبتنی بر الگوی پنج مرحلهای بایبی و سنتی بر خلاقیت ویادگیری دانشآموزان سال سوم راهنمایی در درس علوم در سال تحصیلی 91-90. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
Abdoli Sejzi, A. & Aris, B. B. (2012). International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (ICTLHE 2012) in conjunction with RCEE & RHED. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 56 (2012) 426 – 431.
Açish, S. (2010). An evaluation of activities designed in accordance with the 5Emodel by would-be science teachers. Retrieved January 2012 from http://www. Sciencedirect. Com.
Akbulut, Y. (2007). Implications of two well-known models for instructional designers in distance education: Dick-Carey versus Morrison-Ross-Kemp. Turkish online Journal of Distance Education, 8 (2): 5.
Bello, H. & Aliyu, U. O. (2012). Effect of Dick and Carey instructional model on the performance of electrical/electronic technology education students in some selected concepts in technical colleges of northern Nigeria. Educational Research, 3, (3): 277-283.
Boddy, N.; Watson, K. & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five e’s: a referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33: 27-42.
Bybee, W. Rodger (2009). The bscs 5E instructional model and v2st century skills. Available online at www.Sciencedirect.Com.
Bybee, R. W.; Taylor, J. A.; Gardner, A.; Scotter, P. V.; Powell, J. C. & Westbrook, A. (2006a). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness. A Report Prepared for the Office of Science Education National Institutes of Health. Executive Summary. Colorado Springs: BSCS.
Ceylan, E. (2008). Effects of 5E learning cycle model on understanding of stat of matter and solubility concepts.
Dick, W.; Carey, L. & James, O. (2005). The Systematic Design of Instruction. (6th Ed.). Allyn Bacon.
Emamrizi, C.; Najafipour, M. & MirshahJafari, E. (2013). The effect of the active teaching method on the academic achievement in the Religious concept. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83: 204 – 207.
Ergin, I. (2012). Constructivist approach based 5E model and usability instructional physics.Vol. 6, No: 4.
Fazelian, p.; Naveh ebrahim, A. & Soraghi, S. (2010). The effect of 5E instructional design model on learning and reention of sciences for middle class students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5: 140–143.
Gopal, T. (2008). Integration of the BSCS 5E instructional method and technology in an anatomy and physiology lab. Doctoral dissertation, Southern Mississippi University.
Hirumi, A. (2013).Grounding e-Learning Interactions to facilitate Critical Thinking & Problem Solving. ASTD Annual Conference Dallas, Texas May 19-22.
Karsli, Fethiye & Ayas, Alipaşa. (2014). Developing a Laboratory Activity by Using 5e Learning Model on Student Learning of Factors Affecting the Reaction Rate and Improving Scientific Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143: 663 – 668.
Kaveevivitchai, C. (2008). Enhancing nursing students’ skills in vital signs assessment by using multimedia computer-assisted learning with integrated content of anatomy and Physiology. Retrieved January 2012 from http:// www.sciencedirect.com.
Melton, B.; Zience, A.; Leonard, S.; Pick, E. & Thomasson, L. (2003). A Comparison of Behaviorist and Constructivist-Based Teaching Methods in Psychomotor instruction. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 53 (1).
Merrill, M. D. (1992).Constructivism and instructional design: A conversation Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Miller, C. K. & Peterson, R. L. (2003). Creating a positive climate: cooperative learning, safe & responsive school. Available online at:www.indianaedu/safeschl/cooperative-learning.pdf.
Newby, D. E. (2004). Using inquiry to connect young learners to science. Available online at www.Sciencedirect.Com.
Puacharearn, p. & Fisher, D. (2004). The effectiveness of cooperative learning integrated with constructivist teaching on improving learning environment in the secondary school science classrooms. Paper presented at the IASCE conference. carlton hotel, 21-25.
Tuna, A.; Kacar, A. (2013). The effect of 5E learning cycle model in teaching trigonometry on students’ academic achievement and the permanent of their knowledge. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4 (1), Article: 07.
Tyagi, K. & Verma, I. (2013). Influence of Constructivism in Teaching on Academic Achievement of Primary Students. Journal of Education & Research for Sustainable Development (JERSD). 1 (1).
Yadigaroglu & Demircioglu, (2012). The effect of activities based on 5e model on grade 10 students understanding of gas concept. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47: 634 – 637