Ariel, A.; Veldkamp, B. P. & van der Linden, W. J. (2004). Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 345-360.
Bergstrom, B. A. & Lunz, M. E. (1999). CAT for certification and licensure. In F. Drasgow & J.Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in Computerized Assessment (pp. 67-91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Belov, D. I. & Armstrong, R. D. (2009). Direct and inverse problems of item pool design forcomputerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69 (4), 53-547.
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee‘s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick, Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397-479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chang, H. (2007). Book review: Linear models for optimal test design. Psychometrika, 72, 279-281.
Chang, H. H., & Ying, Z. (1999). Alpha-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
Chang, H. H., & van der Linden, W. J. (2003). Optimal stratification of item pools in a-stratified computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 262-274.
Cheng, Y., & Chang, H. (2009). The maximum priority index method for severely con- strained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369-383.
Chen, S. Y.; Ankenmann, R. D. & Spray, J. A. (1999). Exploring the relationship between item exposure rate and test overlap rate in computerized adaptive testing (No. ACT-RR-99-5): American College Testing Program, Iowa City, IA.
De Ayala, R.J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford Press.
Gu, L. (2007). Designing optimal item pools for computerized adaptive tests with exposure controls. Unpublished doctoral dissertaion. Michigan State University.
Gu, L. & Reckase, M. D. (2007). Designing optimal item pools for computerized adaptive tests with Sympson-Hetter exposure control. Paper Presented at the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing, Minneapolis, MN.
Guide. M. U. S. (2014). The mathwork. Lnc. Natich, MA, 5,333.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
Hau, K. T., & Chang, H. H. (2001). Item selection in computerized adaptive testing: Should more discriminating items be used first. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38 (3), 249-266.
He, W., & Reckase, M. (2010). Optimal item pool design for a highly constrained computerized adaptive test. Unpublished doctoral dissertaion. Michigan State University.
He. W., & Reckase, M. (2011). Optimal item pool design for a highly constrained computerized adaptive test. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education, Denver, CO.
Jensema, C. J. (1977). Bayesian tailored testing and the influence of item bank characteristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 111-120.
Lord, F. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McBride, J. R. & Weiss, D. J. (1976). Some properties of a Bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy (Research Rep No. 76-1). Minneapolis, MN: Psychometric Methods Program, Department of Psychology.
Millman, J. & Arter, J. A. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 315-330.
Owen, R. J. (1975). A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 351-356.
Parshall, C., Davey, T., & Nering, M. (1998). Test development exposure control for adaptive tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego CA.
Reckase, M.D. (1989). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8 (3), 11-15.
Reckase, M. D. (2001). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. Invited small group session at the 6th Conference of the European Association of Psychological Assessment, Aachen, Germany.
Reckase, M. D. (2003). Item pool design for computerized adaptive tests. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.
Reckase, M. D. (2007). The design of p-optimal item bank for computerized adaptive tests. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
Reckase, M. D. (2009). Optimal Item Pool Design for the 2009 NCLEX Exam. A Report SubMTIted to National Council of State Boards of Nursing March 2009.
Reckase, M. D. (2010). Designing Item Pools to Optimize the Functioning of Computerized Adaptive Test. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52 (2), 127-141.
Reckase, M. D. & He, W. (2004). The ideal item pool for the NCLEX-RN examination--Report to NCSBN: Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Reckase, M. D. & He, W. (2005). Ideal item pool design for the NCLEX-RN exam. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Reckase, M. D. & He, W. (2008). The impact of item disclosure (compromise) on the probability of passing of the NCLEX-RN exam--report to the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN): Michigan State University.
Reckase, M. D., & He, W. (2009a). ). Optimal item pool design for the 2009 NCLEX Exam--report to the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN): Michigan State University.
Reckase, M. D., & He, W. (2009b). The influence of item pool quality on the functioning of computerized adaptive tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Psychometric Society, Cambridge, U.K.
Robin, F.; van der Linden, W. J.; Eignor, D. R.; Steffen, M. & Stocking, M. L. (2005). A comparison of two procedures for constrained adaptive test construction (ETS Research Rep No. RR-04-39). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Stocking, M. L. & Swanson, L. (1998). Optimal design of item pools for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 271-279.
Stocking, M. L. & Lewis, C. (2000). Methods of controlling the exposure of items in CAT. In W. J. Van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp.163-182). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sympson, J. B. & Hetter, R. D. (1985). Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Military Testing Association (pp. 973-977). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Urry, V. W. (1977). Tailored testing: A successful application of latent trait theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 181-196.
Van der Linden, W. J. (2000a). Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. In W. J. van der Linden, & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 27–52). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Van der Linden, W. J. (2000 b). Optimal assembly of tests with item sets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 225–240.0.
Van der Linden, W. J. (2005a). A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 283-302.
)