تحلیل تطبیقی نظام دانشگاه تراز جهانی (برنامه‌ها، اقدامات، مضامین)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشکدة روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکدة روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکدة روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران

10.22034/emes.2023.550488.2363

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش، بررسی و تحلیل برنامه­ها و اقدام­های مربوط به نظام دانشگاه­های تراز جهانی به­صورت مطالعه تطبیقی بود.
روش پژوهش: ماهیت و نوع مطالعه بررسی تطبیقی است که براساس رویکرد، کیفی؛ بر اساس هدف، کاربردی؛ براساس شیوه بررسی توصیفی-تحلیلی (اسنادی) بوده و برای این منظور کتب، پیشینه مطالعاتی و پژوهش­های صورت گرفته و اسناد و مدارک موجود پیرامون دانشگاه تراز جهانی در کشورهای چین، ژاپن، سنگاپور، دانمارک، تایوان، هنک کنگ، کره جنوبی، کانادا، سوئد، آلمان، فرانسه، اسپانیا، روسیه، آمریکا مورد مطالعه، بررسی و تحلیل قرار گرفته است. انتخاب کشورها براساس نمونه­گیری هدفمند و با هدف دستیابی به بیشترین اطلاعات صورت گرفت و دلیل انتخاب این کشورها برخورداری از نظام آموزشی پیشرفته و داشتن تجربه قابل بررسی در این حوزه، و امکان دسترسی به مدارک و اسناد کشورهای مذکور در این حوزه نیز وجود داشت. جهت تنظیم تحلیل داده­ها، از روش سه مرحله­ای تلخیص داده­ها، عرضه داده­ها و نتیجه­گیری و برای تحلیل اسناد از روش تحلیل محتوا به شیوع مقوله­بندی استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: یافته­های پژوهش نشان داد اقدام­های مربوط به ایجاد دانشگاه تراز جهانی در اغلب کشورها، شامل حمایت­های مالی و سرمایه­گذاری در دانشگاه­های برتر و متمرکز بر حوزه­های پژوهش، بهبود و تعالی پژوهشی، تعالی آموزشی و بین­المللی­شدن دانشگاه و در برخی از کشورها نیز تحول مدیریتی مانند استقبال مسئولین دولتی و دانشگاهی از مدل نوظهور دانشگاهی و قرار دادن آن به عنوان یکی از مهم­ترین سیاست­گذاری­ها در حوزه نظام دانشگاهی است. همچنین در برخی از کشورها به نوسازی و بازسازی زیرساخت­های آموزشی و پژوهشی دانشگاه­ها و موسسات آموزش عالی تأکید شده است.
نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به نتایج پژوهش می­توان اذعان داشت که توافق و تفاوت در اقدام­های صورت گرفته برای ایجاد و توسعه دانشگاه تراز جهانی وجود دارد که با بهره­گیری از این تفاوت­ها و شباهت­ها، نظام آموزش عالی ایران با توجه به شرایط و اقتضائات خود می­تواند به انتخاب اقدام­های و مولفه­های مناسب و نیز تدوین برنامه­های راهبردی جهت نیل به دانشگاه تراز جهانی بپردازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparative Study of World- Class University System (Programs, Actions, Themes)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Akbar Khorsandi 1
  • Abbas Abbaspour 2
  • Saeed Ghiasi Nodooshan 3
  • Reza Mohammadi 4
1 PhD Student in Higher Education Management, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Allameh Tabataba’i, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor of Department of Educational Management and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Department of Educational Management and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: The purpose of this study was the programs and measures related to the world-class university system in the form of a comparative study.   
Methods:The research method in this research was analytical For this purpose, books, study backgrounds and researches have been done and the existing documents about world-class universities in China, Japan, Singapore, Denmark, Taiwan, Hank Kong, South Korea, Canada, Sweden, Germany, France, Spain, Russia. The United States has been studied and analyzed. The collected methods were analyzed qualitatively.
Results:The research findings showed that the measures related to the establishment of world-class universities in most countries, including financial support and investment in top universities, especially in the field of research, research improvement and excellence, educational excellence and internationalization. University and in some countries, managerial transformation, such as the reception of government and university officials from the emerging university model and its placement as one of the most important policies in the field of university system. In some countries, emphasis has also been placed on modernizing and rebuilding the educational and research infrastructure of universities and higher education institutions.
Conclusion: According to the results of the research, it can be acknowledged that there is agreement and difference in the measures taken to create and develop a world-class university, and Using of these differences and similarities, the higher education system of Iran with according to its conditions and requirements, it can choose the appropriate actions and components as well as formulate strategic plans to achieve a world-class university.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: World- Class University
  • Research Excellence
  • Comparative Study
  • University Excellence

مراجع

References
Academic Ranking of World Universities. (2015). Introduction, 6th International Conference on World-Class.
Alden, J., & Lin, G. (2004). Benchmarking of the characteristics of a World Class University: Developing an international strategy at university le London: The UK Higher Education Leadership Foundation.
Allen, R.M. (2019). Commensuration of the globalized higher education sector: how university rankings act as a credential for world-class status in China”, Compare a Journal of Comparative and International Education, pp. 1-19, doi: 10.1080/03057925.2019.1686607.
Altbach, P. G. (2003). The costs and benefits of world-class universities. International Higher Education, 33, 5–8.
Altbach, P. G. (2004). The costs and benefits of world-class universities. Academe, 90(1), 20–23.
Altbach, P. G. (2007). Empire of knowledge and development. In P. Altbach & J. Balán (Eds.) World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America (pp. 1-28). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Altbach, P. G. (2009). Peripheries and centers: Research universities in developing countries. In J. Sadlak & N. C. Liu (Eds.), The world-class university as part of a new higher education paradigm: From institutional qualities to systemic excellence (pp. 69–96). Bucharest and Cluj-Napoca: UNESCO- CEPES and Cluj University Press.
Altbach, P. G., & Balan, J. (2007). Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America. In P. G. Altbach & Jorge Balan (Eds.), World Class Worldwide. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
Altbach, P.G. and Salmi, J. (2011). The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making of World-Class Research Universities, New York: World Bank.
Artyushina, I., and Troyan, V. (2009). Strategic Principles of Building World-Class Universities in the Russian Federation, In Jan Sadlak and Liu Nian Cai, The World-Class University as Part of a New Higher Education Paradigm: From Institutional Qualities to Systemic Excellence(Part II), UNESCO European Centre for Higher Education Shanghai Jiao Tong University Cluj University Press, pp.219.
Bin Zakaria, Z. Bin Ahmad, A. and Norzaidi, M.D. (2009). Determining World Class University from the Evaluation of Service Quality and Students Satisfaction Level: An Empirical Study in Malaysia", International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 2(2), pp.59-66.
Cheng, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, N.C. (2014). How world-class universities affect global higher education. In How World Class Universities Affect Global Higher Education; Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 2014; pp. 1–10. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-6209-821-3_1 (accessed on 17 September 2018).
Cohen, M., & March, J. (1974). Leadership and Ambiguity: The American college president, New York, Mc Grow- Hill.
Da Wan, C. (2015). Is there a'Mid-Rank Trap'for Universities? Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 4(2), 52-66.
Deem, R., Mok, K.-H., & Lucas, L. (2008). Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of the ‘world-class’ university in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy, 21, 83–97. 
Fazlagic, A. (2005). Measuring the intellectual capital of a university. OECD, conference on trends in management of human resources in H.E. www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/35322785.pdf. October, 02, 2012.
Findlay, A.M.; King, R.; Smith, F.M.; Geddes, A.; Skeldon, R. World class? An investigation of globalisation, difference and international student mobility. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 2012, 37, 118–131.
Huang, F. (2015). Building the world-class research universities: A case study of China. Higher Education, 70, 203–215.
Huang, F. (2018). Building the world-class research universities: A case study of China. Higher Education, 70, 203–215.
Jiang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, Q. Transforming to Excellence: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL). High. Educ. Policy 2018, 21, 1–20.
Kim, D.; Song, Q.; Liu, J.; Liu, Q.; Grimm, A. (2018). Building world class universities in China: Exploring faculty’s perceptions, interpretations of and struggles with global forces in higher education. Compare 2018, 48, 92–109.
Kim, D.; Song, Q.; Liu, J.; Liu, Q.; Grimm, A. (2018). Building world class universities in China: Exploring faculty’s perceptions, interpretations of and struggles with global forces in higher education. Compare, 48, 92–109.
Knight, J. (2013), “The changing landscape of higher education internationalization – for better or worse?”, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 84-90, doi: 10.1080/13603108. 2012.753957.
Lee, J. (2013). Creating world-class universities: Implications for developing countries. Prospects 43, 233–249 (2013). https://doi-org.ezp3.semantak.com/10.1007/s11125-013-9266
Li, J. (2012). World-class higher education and the emerging Chinese model of the university’, Prospects, 42(3), pp 319-339
li,j.(2020). Comprehensive Global Competence for World -Class Universities in China. http://www.springer.com/series/14177
Lo, W.Y.W. and Hou, A.Y.C. (2020). A farewell to internationalization? Striking a balance between global ambition and local needs in higher education in Taiwan. Higher Education, Vol. 80 No. 3, pp. 497-510, doi: 10.1007/s10734-019-00495-0.
Manning, K., Kushnazarov, M. and Oleksiyenko, A. (2019). Contested meanings of international student mobility in Hong Kong and taiwan”, Educational Practice and Theory, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 51-69, doi: 10.7459/ept/41.1.04.
Marginson, S. (2011). Global perspectives and strategies of Asia-Pacific universities. Paths to a World-class university: Lessons from Practices and Experiences, (pp. 3–27). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Marginson, S. (2012). Differnt roads to a shared goal: political and cultural variation in World-Class Universities, Building World-Class Universities: Different Approaches to a Shared Goal (section1: Building World-Class Universities from a national/regional perspective), Rotterdam, Sense publishers, pp.12-15.
Marginson, S. (2017). Global trends in higher education financing: The United Kingdom.
International Journal for Educational Development. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.008.
Mohrman, K. (2011). The emerging global model with Chinese characteristics. High. Educ. Policy, 21, 29–48.
Mok K. H. (2005). The quest for world-class university status: implications for sustainable development of Asianuniversities. (15 April 2016). Available at: www.researchcghe.org/publications/working-paper/the-questfor-world-class-university-status-implications-for-sustainable-development-of-asian-universities/
Mok K. H. (2016). The quest for world-class university status: implications for sustainable development of Asianuniversities. (15 April 2016). Available at: www.researchcghe.org/publications/working-paper/the-questfor-world-class-university-status-implications-for-sustainable-development-of-asian-universities.
Mok, K.H. and Cheung, A.B.L. (2011). Global aspirations and strategizing for world-class status: New form of politics in higher education governance in Hong Kong’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(3): 231–251.
 Ngok, K., & Guo, W. (2008). The Quest for World Class Universities in China: critical reflections. Policy Futures in Education. 6(5). pp545-557.
Niland, J. (2007). The challenge of building world- class universities. The world class university and ranking: Aiming beyond status.
Pan, S. Y. (2013). China's approach to the international market for higher education students: Strategies and implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(3), 249-263.
Park, J. (2018). Researching higher education in Asia”, in Jung, J., Horta, H. and Yonezawa, A. (Eds), Higher Education in Asia: Quality, Excellence and Governance, pp. 51-72, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4989-7.
Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative researcgh & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice.(Fourth edition). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE publications, Inc.
Rafati, F., Khandan, M., Sabzevari, S., and Nouhi, I. (2014). A comparative study of the curriculum of nursing doctoral course in Iran and Widener University. Education in Medical Sciences, 15(70), 568-555.
Ramirez, F. O., & Tiplic, D. (2014). In pursuit of excellence? Discursive patterns in European higher education research. Higher Education, 67(4), 439–455. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9681-1.
Rosemeary et. al. (2008). Transforming Higher Education in Whose Image? Exploring the Concept of the World-Class University in Europe and Asia.
Sadlak, J., & Liu, N. C. (2009). The world-class universities as part of a new higher education paradigm: From institutional qualities to systemic excellence. Bucharest and Cluj-Napoca: UNESCO- CEPES and Cluj University Press.
Salmi, J. (2009). The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. Directions in development. Washington, D.C: the World Bank. Also available at http://portal.unesco.org/ education/en/files/55825/12017990845Salmi.pdf/Salmi.pdf
Sanchez, P., Elena, S., & Castrillo, R. (2009). Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(2), pp. 307-324.
Secundo, G., Margherita, A., Elia, G. & Passiante, G. (2010). Intangible assets in higher education & research: mission, performance or both? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), pp. 140-157
Shattock, M. (2017). The ‘world class’ university and international ranking systems: what are the policy implications for governments and institutions? Policy Rev. High. Educ. 1, 4–21.
Shi, J.-H. (2009). Combining vision, mission and action: Tsinghua’s experience in building a world-class university. The world-class university as part of a new higher educational paradigm: From institutional qualities to systematic excellence (pp. 307–324). Bucharest, Romania: UNESCO-CEPES.
Shin, J. C., & Jang, Y. S. (2013). World-class university in Korea: Proactive government, responsive university, and procrastinating academics. Institutionali- zation of world-class university in global competition (pp. 147– 164). New York: Springer.
Shin, J.C. and Harman, G. (2009), “New challenges for higher education: global and Asia-Pacific perspectives”, Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.1007/s12564-009-9011-6.
THE World University Rankings (2018).The formula for a world-class university revealed. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/news/the-formula-for-a-world-classuniversity-revealed.
Tijani, H. (2013). Pedagogy and Methodology of Africa, Africans, and the Global Diaspora: Notes from Multidisciplinary Experiments, being a keynote lecture presented at the 25th Anniversary of the Institute for African Studies, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Tilak, J.B. (2016). Global rankings, world-class universities and dilemma in higher education policy in India. High.Educ. Future 2016, 3, 126–143.
Wang, Qi. (2011). A comparative analysis of different national initiatives for building world-class universities. 2011 Comparative and International Education Conference, Montreal, Canada.
Yan, G. (2011) ‘Thoughts on the role of government in the development of world-class universities in China’. Chinese Education and Society, 44(5): 57–66.
Yang, R. (2014). China’s strategy for the internationalisation of education: An overview. Frontiers of Education in China, 9(2), 151–162. doi: 10.3868/s110-003-014-0014-x.
Yang, R. (2015). China’s strategy for the internationalisation of education: An overview. Frontiers of Education in China, 9(2), 151–162. doi: 10.3868/s110-003-014-0014-x
Yang, R. (2019). Turning scars into stars: A re-conceptualized view of modern university development in Beijing, Hong Kong, Taipei, and Singapore. Frontiers of Education in China, 14(1), 1-32.
Yang, R. and Welch, A. (2012). A world-class university in China? The case of Tsinghua’, Higher Education, 63(5): 645–666.
Yonezawa, A. (2007). Japanese Flagship Universities at a Crossroads. Higher Education, 54(4) pp 483-499.
Zaini, R., Lyan, D., & Rebentisch, E. (2015). Start-up Research Universities, High Aspirations in a Complex Reality: A Russian Start-up University Case Analysis Using Stakeholder Value Analysis and System Dynamics Modeling.
مطالعات اندازه گیری و ارزشیابی آموزشی
دوره 13، شماره 41
فروردین 1402
صفحه 88-109

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار