تحلیل محتوای انواع مقالات مرتبط با الگوهای ارزشیابی برنامه درسی بر اساس تاکید بر عناصر برنامه درسی و معیارهای اثربخشی درونی و بیرونی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیأت علمی، گروه مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شهر شیراز، ایران

2 دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شهر شیراز، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شهر شیراز، ایران

4 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شهر شیراز، ایران

5 عضو هیات علمی، گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، شهر شیراز، ایران

10.22034/emes.2023.1988425.2456

چکیده

هدف: هدف کلی از انجام این پژوهش، تحلیل محتوای انواع مقالات مرتبط با الگوهای ارزشیابی برنامه درسی بر اساس تاکید بر عناصر برنامه درسی و معیارهای اثربخشی درونی و بیرونی بوده است.
روش پژوهش: کمی، از نوع توصیفی و بر اساس تحلیل محتوای کمّی می­باشد. جامعه آماری تمامی منابع پژوهشی چاپ شده در حوزه ارزشیابی برنامه درسی است و تمامی آن­ها بروز، در بازه زمانی پنج ساله 2017 تا 2022 و 1396 تا 1401 به عنوان نمونه انتخاب گردیدند. ابزار اندازه­گیری اسنادی و روش گردآوری داده­ها بر مبنای الگوهای ارزشیابی برنامه درسی و تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از تکنیک آنتروپی شانون انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: از میان ده عنصر، محتوا بالاترین و کارسازترین ضریب اهمیت و زمان یادگیری دارای کمترین ضریب اهمیت بود. در معیارهای ارزشیابی درونی و بیرونی، منطق دارای بالاترین ضریب اهمیت و انسجام دارای کمترین ضریب اهمیت بود. همچنین، از بین انواع الگوهای ارزشیابی برنامه درسی که برای تحلیل محتوای مقالات منتخب استفاده شد، الگوی کرک پاتریک موثرترین و بالاترین ضریب اهمیت و الگوی تین دارای کمترین ضریب اهمیت بود.
نتیجه‌گیری: جهت حصول اطمینان در مورد چگونگی اجرای صحیح یک برنامه درسی و بهبود و ارتقاء برنامه‌های درسی در حوزه آموزش و پرورش ضروری­ست که اثربخشی همه عناصر برنامه درسی و معیارهای درونی و بیرونی برنامه درسی، در تحلیل ارزشیابی مقالات مورد توجه قرار گیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Content Analysis of Various Articles Related to Curriculum Evaluation patterns Based on Emphasis on Curriculum Elements and Its Internal and External Effectiveness Criteria

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Mohammadi 1
  • Reza Naseri Jahromi 2
  • Solmaz Khademi 3
  • Sedigheh Shadi 4
  • Majid Kowsary 5
1 Faculty member, Department of Educational Management and Planning, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 PhD in Curriculum Planning, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
3 PhD student in Curriculum Planning, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
4 MA in Curriculum Planning, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
5 Member of the academic staff, Department of Management and Curriculum Planning, Farhangian University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Purpose: The total purpose of this research was to analyze the content of various articles related to curriculum evaluation patterns based on emphasis on curriculum elements and internal and external effectiveness criteria.
 methods: quantitative, descriptive and based on quantitative content analysis. The statistical population is all research sources published in the field of curriculum evaluation, and all of them were selected as samples in the five-year period from 2017 to 2022 and 2016 to 2016. Documentary measurement tools and data collection methods were based on curriculum evaluation patterns and data analysis was done using Shannon's entropy technique.
Results: Among ten elements, content had the highest and most effective importance coefficient and learning time had the lowest importance coefficient. In internal and external evaluation criteria, logic had the highest importance coefficient and coherence had the lowest importance coefficient. Also, among the types of curriculum evaluation models that were used to analyze the content of the selected articles, Kirkpatrick's model was the most effective and had the highest importance coefficient, and Tien's model had the lowest importance coefficient.
Conclusion: In order to ensure the correct implementation of a curriculum and the improvement and promotion of curricula in the field of education, it is necessary that the effectiveness of all curriculum elements and the internal and external criteria of the curriculum should be considered in the evaluation analysis of articles.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: content analysis
  • curriculum evaluation patterns
  • curriculum elements
  • internal and external effectiveness criteria of the curriculum

References

Adibmanesh, A. (2019). Phenomenology of elementary teachers' experiences from the full implementation of qualitative-descriptive evaluation plan. Educational Research, 38(6), 60-85.
Aldapit, E., & Suharjana, S. (2019). CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research1(2), 104-116.
Alsalamah, A., Callinan, C. (2021). Adaptation of Kirkpatricks four-level model of training criteria to evaluate training programmes for head teachers. Education Sciences, 11(3), 116.
ALTHEIDE, D. & JOHNSON, J.C. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretative validity in qualitative research, in: N.K. DENZIN & Y.S. LINCOLN (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
Andayani, M. A., & Situmorang, R. (2020). Evaluating the Implementation of Strengthening Character Education Program using CIPP Model in Elementary Schools.
Arjun, P. (1998). An evaluation of the proposed new curricula for schools in relation to Kuhn's conception of paradigms and paradigm shifts. South African Journal of Higher Educ ation 12(1):20-26.
Aslan, M., & Uygun, N. (2019). Evaluation of Preschool Curriculum by Stufflebeams Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 44(200).
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development5(1), 189-206.
AZIZI MAHMOODABAD, M. E. H. R. A. N., & Nili, M. R. (2019). Evaluation of Elementary math curriculum: presenting a proposal model. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education15(2), 123-146.
Bandali, B., Abolghasemi, M., Pardakhtchi, M., Rezaizadeh, M. (2018). Pathology of academic faculty development programs of Shahid Beheshti University. Education and development of human resources, 18(5), 25-54.‎
Baniasad, S., Hosseingholizadeh, R., & Amin Khandaghi, M. (2018). Evaluation of School Management Excellence Program with Goal free Model. Journal of school administration, 6(2), 56-77.
Batubara, H. S., Kurniawan, A., Bulan, I., Riyanda, A. R., Ambiyar, A., & Rizal, F. (2022). Performance Evaluation of Certified Teachers Using the Charlotte Danielson Model Approach. EDUKATIF: JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(4), 5248-5255.
Bebell, C. (1962). Evaluation and curriculum development. Educational Leadership, 17,4-6. In D. A. Payne, (Ed.). (1974). Curriculum evaluation: Commentaries on purpose, process, product. Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath and Company.
Bharvad, A. J. (2010). Curriculum evaluation. International Research Journal1(12), 72-74.
Bhuttah, T. M., Xiaoduan, C., Ullah, H., & Javed, S. (2019). Analysis of curriculum development stages from the perspective of Tyler, Taba and Wheeler. European Journal of Social Sciences, 58(1), 14-22.
Brown, J.D. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum. A Systematic Approach to Program
Development.
Heinle and Heinle Publishers: Boston.
Buker, M., & Niklason, G. (2019). Curriculum evaluation & improvement model. Journal of Health Administration Education, 36(1), 37-55.
Cahapay, M. B. (2020). The responsiveness of Bachelor of Elementary Education curriculum: An illuminative evaluation. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 743-750.
Coffield, E., Nihiser, A., Carlson, S., Collins, J., Cawley, J., Lee, S., & Economos, C. (2019). Shape Up Somervilles return on investment: Multi-group exposure generates net-benefits in a child obesity intervention. Preventive medicine reports, 16, 100954.
Cohen, D., & Fraser, B. J. (1987). The Processes of Curriculum Development and Evaluation. A Retrospective Account of the Processes of the Australian Science Education Project.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2005). A guide to teaching practice. (5th ed.) London: Rutledge Flamer.
Dacumos, L. P., & Kita, M. (2021). Through the teachers lens: Evaluation of the project-based curricula of Philippine and Japanese science high schools. SEAQIS Journal of Science Education, 1(02), 1-17.
Darma, I. K. (2019). The effectiveness of teaching program of CIPP evaluation model: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bali. International research journal of engineering, IT & scientific research, 5(3), 236-254.
DAVIS, E., 1981, Teachers as Curriculum Evaluators (London, Allen and Unwin).
FETTERMAN, F., 1982, Ethnography in educational research: the dynamics of diffusion, Educational Researcher, 11, pp. 17-22.
Dehkordi, M. E., & Talebinezhad, M. R. (2018). A CIPP approach to evaluation of grammar teaching program at a high school in Iran. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(2), 241-260.
Dewi, L. R., & Kartowagiran, B. (2018). An evaluation of internship program by using Kirkpatrick evaluation model. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(2), 155-163.
Dizon, A. G. (2022). Historical development of CIPP as a curriculum evaluation model. History of Education, 1-20.
Dolly, V. P., & Mukhaiyar, R. (2020). Concept of Curriculum Evaluation in Education Program of Electrical Engineering using AUN-QA as Benchmarking. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan, 3(1), 1-5.
Endhai Arani, A., Vasifian, F., Hasni, M., & Qaltash, A. (2021). Primary school teachers' lived experiences of the functions of the descriptive evaluation model. Education in law enforcement science, 9(32), 91-111.‎
Endri, E. (2020). Evaluation of overseas field study program at the Indonesia Defense University. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(10).
Fateh Nejad, Cyrus; Andishmand, Vida, (2018). Teachers lived experience of the effectiveness of descriptive evaluation in elementary school with a phenomenological approach. New research approaches in management and accounting. (21)
Fathi Vajargah, Korosh. (1390). Lesson planning principles, Iran Zemin publisher.
Ghahrouie, M. R., & Nourabadi, S. (2019). Evaluation the Proposed Teaching Methods of 6th Grade Math Teachers Guidebook in Iranian Educational System Based on CIPP Evaluation Model. Dilemas Contemporaneos: Educacion Politicay Valores, (Publication no. 4/Special Edition).
Gholami, Abed; Zainalipour, Hossein Sheikhi Fini, Ali Akbar, Samavi, Seyyed Abdul Wahab (2022). Measuring and evaluating the curriculum components of preschool art education using the importance-performance analysis model. Educational leadership and management. 16(1)
GIBBS, G., (1983). An Overview: Dimensions of evaluation, alternative models of course evaluation examples for Oxford Polytechnic, Standing Conference for Educational Development, Occasional Paper No 13 (Oxford, Oxford Polytechnic).
Gondikit, J. (2018). The Evaluation of Post PT3 Program Using Stakes Countenance Model. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 3(4), 109-118.
Goudarzi, F., Maleki, H., Khosravi, M., & Abbaspour, A. (2021). Elements of the Secondary School Social Education Curriculum Based on the Tyler Model: characteristics and Requirements. Research in Teaching, 9(1), 254-234.
Greaves, F. (1980). Objectively toward curriculum improvement in nursing education in England and Wales. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 5(6), 591-599.
Guba, E.G. and Stufflbeam, D. L. (1970). Evaluation: The process of stimulating, Aiding and Abetting Insightful Action in Smith, C.B (ed) Monograph series in Reading Education No. (1 June 1970). Indian University.
Gunung, I. N., & Darma, I. K. (2019). Implementing the context, input, process, product (CIPP) evaluation model to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of teaching at Politeknik Negeri Bali (PNB). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education-IJESE, 14(1).
Harjanti, R., Supriyati, Y., & Rahayu, W. (2019). Evaluation of learning programs at elementary school level of “Sekolah Alam Indonesia (SAI)”: evaluative research using countenance stakes model. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 125-132.
HARVEY, L. (Ed.), 1993, Quality Assessment in Higher Education: The collected papers of the QHE Project (Birmingham, Quality in Higher Education, The University of Central England in Birmingham).
HARVEY, L., & KNIGHT, P., 1996, Transforming Higher Education (Buckingham, The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press).
HARVEY, L., PLIMMER, L., GEALL, V. & MOON, S., 1997, Student Satisfaction Manual (Buckingham, Open University Press).
Heydari, M. R., Taghva, F., Amini, M., & Delavari, S. (2019). Using Kirkpatricks model to measure the effect of a new teaching and learning methods workshop for health care staff. BMC research notes, 12(1), 1-5.
Holt. M. (1980). School and Curriculum Change. London: McGraw Hill Book Company.
HOUSE, E.R., 1978, Assumptions underlying evaluation models, Educational Researcher, 7, pp. 4-12.
Hussain, A., Dogar, A. H., Azeem, M., & Shakoor, A. (2011). Evaluation of curriculum development process. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science1(14), 263-271.
Hutahaean, B., Telaumbanua, S., & Tamba, L. (2022). Development of a Multidimensional Curriculum Evaluation Model for the Independent Curriculum in Elementary Schools. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama, 14(2), 705-724.
Iskandar, A. (2019). Evaluasi Diklat Asn Model Kirkpatrick (Studi Kasus Pelatihan Effective Negotiation Skill Balai Diklat Keuangan Makassar)(Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model On Civil Servant Training (Case Study Of Financial Educatioan And Training Agency Of Makassar)). Jurnal Pendidikan, 20, 18-39.
Jalali, Kamal; Taleb, Hashemi, (2021). Competency-based evaluation model based on fundamental change document in Sama secondary schools, a qualitative study. Ahvaz Jundishapour Training Development Journal, 12, 154-165
Jenabi, Marjan; Saif Naraghi, Maryam; Naderi, Ezzatullah; Hashemi, Syed Ahmad (2019). Extracting the factor load of the evaluation items of the resilience textbook content model for exceptional students of the first grade of elementary school based on the components of Tylers curriculum. Education in law enforcement sciences, 27(28), 131-153.‎
Jiang, H., & Liu, Y. (2021). Construction of teaching quality evaluation system of higher vocational project-based curriculum based on CIPP model. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(6), 262-268.
Jones, C., Fraser, J., & Randall, S. (2018). The evaluation of a home-based pediatric nursing service: concept and design development using the Kirkpatrick model. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(6), 492-501.
KEMMIS, S. & HUGHES, C. (1979). Curriculum evaluation in higher education: self-reflection in a critical community, paper in the proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) (Brisbane, Australia, HERDSA).
Kennedy, C. (1987). Innovating for a change: teacher development and innovation. ELT Journal, Volume 41/3 July 1987. Oxford University Press.
Kids Study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 395-397). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
KIRKPATRICK, D.L. (1967), Evaluation of training, in: R.L. CRAIG & L.R. BITTEL (Eds) Training and Development Handbook (McGraw-Hill, USA, American Society of Training and Development).
Klein, M. F. (1972). Use of taxonomy of educational objectives (cognitive domain) in constructing tests for primary school pupils. The Journal of Experimental Education, 40(3), 38-50.
Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of family medicine and primary care, 4(3), 324.
Li, H., Majumdar, R., Chen, M. R. A., & Ogata, H. (2021). Goal-oriented active learning (GOAL) system to promote reading engagement, self-directed learning behavior, and motivation in extensive reading. Computers & Education, 171, 104239.
Maddlo, Q., Saadatmand, Z., & Mohammadian, M. H. (2019). Components of parent participation in elementary school curricula with emphasis on the element of evaluation. Social Science Quarterly12(43), 81-100.
Maesaroh, M., Ghozali, M., Dinana, A., Baiti, M., & Fikri, S. M. (2022). ANALYSIS OF CONTEXT, INPUT, PROCESS, AND PRODUCT (CIPP) MODEL EVALUATION IN THE KIBAR GUIDANCE PROGRAM IN LEARNING TO READ AND WRITE AL-QURAN AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DURING COVID-19. JIP (Jurnal Ilmiah PGMI), 8(1), 43-52.
Mager, R. F. (1984). Preparing Instructional Objectives (2nd edn), Pitman Learning Inc.
Maharani, M. S., & Putro, N. H. P. S. (2021). Evaluation of TOEFL preparation course program to improve students’ test score. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan25(1), 63-76.
Mahmoodi, M., Rashtchi, M., & Abbasian, G. R. (2019). Evaluation of in-service teacher training program in Iran: Focus on the Kirkpatrick model. Education and Self Development, 14(4), 20-38.
Maroufi, Y., Musapour, N., & Hosni, H. (2018). Examining the concordance level of the planned and implemented curriculum of the educational courses of the continuous undergraduate course of elementary education of Farhangian University. Educational and educational studies, 7(1), 71-98.
Marsh, C. (2004). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. 3rd edition. Routledge Falmer: London and New York.
MARSHALL, J. & PETERS, M. (1985). Evaluation and education: the ideal learning community, Policy Sciences, 18, pp. 263-88.
MELROSE, M. (1994). Development and evaluation of the certificate in educational leadership: an investigation of the context and the perceptions about a programme for Polytechnic staff at the Centre for Professional Development, Auckland Institute of Technology. Ph.D. thesis, University of Auckland.
Mirzaie, H., Rezaian, F., & Hosseini, S. M. (2020). Evaluation of environmental considerations within Iranian elementary school social studies curriculum. Biannual Journal of Education Experiences, 3(1), 85-96.
Mohammadi, M; Taqvai, M; Turkzadeh, J., & Ali Niay Demochali, Z. (2011). Evaluation of the curriculum of the Faculty of Agriculture of Shiraz University based on the 3D TIN model. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology - Shiraz University - Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology (dissertation).
Naboizadeh, S.Z., Mashinchi, A.A., Hashemi, A., & Mohammadjani, S. (2021). Identifying factors affecting the successful implementation of descriptive evaluation in Iran's primary education system and comparing Iran's descriptive evaluation with selected countries. Sociology of Education, 7(1), 241-253
Nahardani, S. Z., Arabshahi, K. S., & Pashmdarfard, M. (2022). Developing the Spiritual Health Curriculum Approach Based on Tylers Model in Iran. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 36.
Najafi Birgani, A. (2022). The effect of the qualitative-descriptive evaluation model on the improvement of the teaching-learning process of second grade male students of Gatund city. New research approaches in management and accounting, 6(21), 1278-1248.‎
Nasirian-Thamrin, K., Thamri, I.,  Soleimani, T., & Namour, Y. (2019). Design of educational quality evaluation model in Technical and Vocational University "by mixed method". New educational ideas, 53(15), 199-227.
Nevin, A. V. C. I., Erikci, B., & Ahmet, O. K. (2021). The Evaluation of Secondary Education Basic Mathematics Curriculum through Stakes Responsive Evaluation Model. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, (27), 1-25.
Nichols, B., Shidaker, S., Johnson, G., and Singer, K. (2006). Managing Curriculum and Assessment. A Practitioners Guide. Linworth Books: Ohio
Okoro, J. I., Ballen, B., Afterman, M., Harris Adamson, C., & Robertson, M. M. (2021, September). Increasing physical activity among elementary school students during distance learning: The StandUp
Osman, R. M. (2010). Educational evaluation and testing, African Virtual university, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/
Ozudogru, M., & Aksu, M. (2020). Pre-service teacher's achievement and perceptions of the classroom environment in flipped learning and traditional instruction classes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 27-43.
Paridah, S., Hidayat, O. S., & Komalasari, G. (2022). CIPP Evaluation Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) Program for Strengthening Character Education through Thematic Learning in The Era of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Unipa Surabaya, 18(1), 61-72.
Paripour, A; Sarmadi, M; Natagi, F; & Mohammadi Naini, M. (2019). Presenting the quality evaluation model of combined education in higher education based on SIP evaluation approach. Research in the educational system. 14(51)
Parlett, M., & Hamilton, D. (1972). " Evaluation as Illumination: A New Approach to the Study of Innovatory Programs". Occasional Paper.
POPHAM, W.J., (1988). Educational Evaluation (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall).
Pramono, R. (2021). The Evaluation of Narada Cup School Sport Program Using CIPP Evaluation Model.
Prijowuntato, S. W., & Widharyanto, B. (2021). Training Evaluation of Elementary School Teachers Of 3T Regions Of Mahakam Ulu Regency By Using Kirkpatrick. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 5(2), 185-195.
Print, M. (1993). Curriculum Development and Design. Sydney: National library of Australia cataloging in-publication entry.
PRINT, M., (1988), Curriculum Development and Design (Sydney, Allen and Unwin).
PROVUS, M., 1971, Discrepancy Evaluation (Berkley, CA, McCutchan Publishing).
Ramadhani, Y. R., & Abidin, J. (2021). Evaluation in distance learning in English courses: a case study of non-english department students. JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 9(4), 463-467.
Rastegar, A., Seif, M. H., Talebi, S., & Tajvaran, M. (2020). Evaluating the quality of professors and students of Basic Sciences Educational Groups of Shiraz School of Medicine in input and process section based on CIPP model. Journal of Medicine and Spiritual Cultivation29(1), 37-50.
Razak, T. M. T. A., Jalil, M. H., Shamsuddin, Z., Ibrahim, N., & Abd Aziz, N. (2022). Effective Assessment Model to Reduce Risk Management: A Micro Entrepreneur Program. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 8877-8882.
RODE, T., & Hayashi, P. M. (2021). An Analysis of Effective Teacher PD Practices for Elementary School Home Room Teachers of Foreign Language Classes, Bulletin of Meikai Teacher-Training Support Center, 4, 19-25.
Saadatzadeh, S., Nateghi, F., Seifi, M., & Jalalvandi, M. (2022). Analysis of spiritual awareness in heavenly gifts curriculum of second grade elementary schools in Iran. International Journal of Childrens Spirituality, 27(1), 41-73.
Safai Mowhed, S., Hajizad, M. (2020). Curriculum evaluation as a complex phenomenon. Theory and Practice in Curriculum, 8(16), 191-214.‎
Safai, N., Zarei, I., & Samavi, A. (2021). Designing and validating a curriculum model based on creative thinking skills for primary school students. Education Technology, 15(3), 579-590
Sanjay K, J., Jaivir, T., & Vishal, S. (2010). Simulation of runoff and sediment yield for a Himalayan watershed using SWAT model. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2010.
Sari, A. N., & Anugraheni, D. W. (2022). EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING PROGRAM DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC USING THE KIRKPATRICK MODEL. Pamomong: Journal of Islamic Educational Counseling, 3(1), 25-38.
Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal. 27: 379–423.
Singh, N., Gunjan, V. K., Kadiyala, R., Xin, Q., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2022). Performance Evaluation of SeisTutor Using Cognitive Intelligence‐Based “Kirkpatrick Model”. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022.
Spittle, M., & Spittle, S. (2016). Content of curriculum in physical education teacher education: expectations of undergraduate physical education students. Asia-pacific journal of teacher education, 44(3), 257-273.
Stake, R. E. (1975). Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. (No Title).
Stenhouse, L. (1970). Some limitations of the use of objectives in curriculum research and planning. Paedagogica Europaea, 73-83.
Steyn, C. M. V. A. (2017). An appreciative inquiry into the design of a conceptual model for a flexible undergraduate curriculum structure (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State).
Stufflebeam, D.L. & GUBA, E.G. (1971). Educational Evaluation and Decision-making. Phi Beta Kappa, National study committee on education (Itasca, IL, Peacock).
Subando, J., Kartawagiran, B., & Munadi, S. (2021). Development of Curriculum Evaluation Model As A Foundation in Strengthening The Ideology of Al-Irsyad Education. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 10(2), 86-99.
Tang, W., Bai, J., Liu, J., Wang, H., & Chen, Q. (2012). Students' evaluation indicators of the curriculum Int J Med Educ, 3, 103-106.
TAŞGIN, A. (2021). Evaluation of a mathematics curriculum in accordance with the Eisner’s educational connoisseurship and criticism model: Evaluation of a mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 1226-1240.
Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A., Chiarotto, A., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., ... & Mokkink, L. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1159-1170.
Tuju, R. S., Rumbekwan, G., Sinaga, D. C., Ellss, V., & Mandacan, Y. (2022). Curriculum Evaluation Model in Development Higher Education Curriculum. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 2025-2032.
TYLER, R.W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
Van den Akker, J., Kuiper, W., Hameyer, U., & van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. Curriculum landscapes and trends, 1-10.
Vuksanović, N., Joksimović, L., & Aleksić, D. (2018). School to work transition in Serbia: returns to investment in education of youth. Industrija, 46(1), 115-136.
Walker, R., Bennett, C., Kumar, A., Adamski, M., Blumfield, M., Mazza, D., & Truby, H. (2019). Evaluating online continuing professional development regarding weight management for pregnancy using the New World Kirkpatrick Model. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 39(3), 210-217.
Widiharti, W., Tola, B., & Supriyat, Y. (2019). Evaluation of principal partnership programs in the directorate of education management-The application of Kirkpartick and countenance stake evaluation model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9A), 71-77.
WORTHERN, B.R. (1977). A Multiple Method Approach to Evaluation (Multiple Method, Multiple Sources), workshop material, Evaluation Workshop (Canberra, Australian Association for Research in Education).
Yanti, D., & Azhariyah, S. (2020, August). Development Program Evaluation on Entrepreneurship Course in Vocational High School West Sumatra. In 1st Progress in Social Science, Humanities and Education Research Symposium (PSSHERS 2019) (pp. 19-22). Atlantis Press.
Zurqoni, R., Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Impact of character education implementation: A goal-free evaluation. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(6), 881.